Did ChatGPT change how companies write? 27 years of homepages, measured

SGR-004, conducted 2026-10-04. Analyst: Jack Stovell, founder, ScriptGrain.

Question: How has the writing on company homepages changed over 27 years, and did anything shift after ChatGPT arrived in November 2022?

Summary

Background. Since ChatGPT launched in November 2022, people have said that the web "sounds like AI": the same words (seamless, unlock, elevate) and the same punctuation (the em dash) everywhere. Most of that is anecdote. This study measures it on the pages companies care most about, their homepages, across 27 years, so the change after 2022 can be seen against the two decades before it.

What we did. We fixed a panel of 161 long-lived UK and US company homepages in 11 sectors, and two word lists, before measuring anything. For every site and every year from 2000 to 2026 we took the Wayback Machine's capture nearest 1 July, rendered it as a visitor would have seen it, kept only the prose (no menus, footers or scripts) and measured it with the same code ScriptGrain uses on writing every day. 2,950 homepages had enough prose to measure. To separate a real change from a change in which sites were measured, every site was compared with itself: its homepages from 2019 to 2022 against its homepages from 2023 to 2026.

What we found. The words changed; the sentences did not. AI-era marketing vocabulary nearly doubled after ChatGPT (1.05 to 1.93 uses per 1,000 words, up on 83 sites and down on 27), and in 2023 it overtook the dotcom vocabulary of "solutions" and "click here" that had led since 2000. But the rise began years before ChatGPT, the em dash had been spreading for two decades before it, and the sentence shapes people associate with AI writing did not increase at all. Homepages also more than tripled in length over the period.

What it means. On company homepages, the "AI voice" is mostly a vocabulary, and an older one than its name suggests: marketing was drifting towards these words long before a model could write them, and ChatGPT appears to have sped the drift up rather than started it. So, on homepages, these words on their own are weak evidence that a page was written with AI.

Key numbers

Sample

A fixed panel of 161 companies whose homepages have been online since 2000 or soon after, chosen before anything was measured: 11 sectors (software, hardware, retail, finance, insurance, telecoms and media, travel, consumer brands, logistics and cars, agencies and consultancies, web and marketing tools), UK and US. For each site and each year, the homepage was requested from the Wayback Machine at 1 July; the nearest capture was kept only if it fell in the same calendar year. Each capture was then rendered with JavaScript (so a homepage built in the browser is measured on what a visitor saw, not an empty shell), and the raw archived HTML was measured too, as a check.

Method

Panel and vocabularies fixed on 4 October 2026, before any page was measured (scripts/experiments/sgr-004/panel.json and lexicons.json).

Fetch: the Wayback Machine's raw capture for each site-year (crawl.mjs), then the same capture rendered with JavaScript by Firecrawl with the archive's toolbar removed (render.mjs). Two thirds of the way through, the archive rate-limited our server; the remaining site-years were requested by date through Firecrawl only, so they have no raw-HTML twin.

Extraction: visible prose lines, with scripts, navigation and footers removed, using the same block splitting and prose-line rule as the product's URL reader. Unlike that reader, page headers, forms and asides are kept, because on a homepage that is where the headline copy sits; repeated lines (desktop and mobile copies of one carousel) are counted once.

Measurement: the product's own deterministic instruments, measureTextFeatures and scanCliches, the same code that powers the AI cliché checker and voice matching. No language model was used to read or score any page.

Vocabularies: an AI-era list (29 entries, among them seamless, unlock, elevate, streamline) and a dotcom corporate list (19 entries, among them solutions, world-class, synergy, click here), counted per 1,000 words. Neither says a page was written by AI; they track vocabulary only.

Before and after: each site's mean over its 2019 to 2022 captures against its mean over its 2023 to 2026 captures, paired by site, so sites entering or leaving the panel cannot move the result. ChatGPT launched on 30 November 2022; captures are taken nearest 1 July, so 2022 is before and 2023 after.

Variables measured

What each measure means

Words of prose
Words in lines that read as sentences or headlines (at least four words, or ending like a sentence), after scripts, navigation and footers are removed. Menu items and button labels do not count.
AI-era vocabulary
Uses per 1,000 words of a fixed list of 29 words and phrases widely reported as over-used in AI-assisted marketing copy: seamless, elevate, unlock, empower, streamline, supercharge, unleash, effortless, transformative, game-changer, game changer, cutting-edge, next-level, revolutionis, revolutioniz, harness, delve, tapestry, realm, embark, navigate the, landscape, journey, reimagin, redefin, at scale, in seconds. The headline figure ("style words only") leaves out ai-powered and powered by AI, which describe a product rather than a style.
Dotcom corporate vocabulary
Uses per 1,000 words of a fixed list of 19 stock phrases of 2000s corporate sites: solutions, leading provider, world-class, best-of-breed, best of breed, synergy, synergies, e-business, e-commerce solutions, value-added, one-stop, industry-leading, mission-critical, turnkey, enterprise-class, total solution, premier, click here, welcome to.
AI-tell density
ScriptGrain's published count of AI-associated transitions and sentence shapes per 1,000 words, the same scan as the free AI cliché checker: stock connectives (furthermore, delve into, in today's world), 'not X but Y' balancing, reflexive lists of three, chains of semicolons and similar.
Em dash share
The share of homepages with at least one em dash (the long dash). En dashes are not counted here, because they also mark ranges such as 2000 to 2026.
Average sentence length
Words per sentence across the homepage's prose. Homepage copy is mostly headlines and short claims, so it runs far shorter than articles.
Contractions
Uses of forms such as we're, don't and it's per 1,000 words: a simple measure of how conversational the copy is.
Paired before and after
Each site's average over its 2019 to 2022 homepages compared with its own average over 2023 to 2026. Only sites measured in both windows count, so the result cannot come from which sites happened to be in the archive.

Findings

What this study does not show

Two vocabularies, 2000 to 2026

Mean uses per 1,000 words across every homepage measured that year. The AI-era line is style words only; the two AI-topic phrases are excluded (see Limitations).

Line chart: AI-era marketing words rise from about 0.4 per 1,000 words in 2000 to 2.2 in 2026, while dotcom words fall from 3.7 to 1.8.
Source: ScriptGrain SGR-004, CC BY 4.0.

Homepages using an em dash

Line chart: the share of homepages with at least one em dash rises from 3% in 2000 to 27% in 2022 and 38% in 2026.
Source: ScriptGrain SGR-004, CC BY 4.0.

Words of prose on the homepage

Line chart: median words of prose on a homepage rise from 169 in 2000 to 606 in 2026.
Median, with the middle half of sites shaded. Source: ScriptGrain SGR-004, CC BY 4.0.

Before and after ChatGPT, paired by site

Each site's mean over 2019 to 2022 against its mean over 2023 to 2026. Only sites measured in both windows count (147 sites).

MeasureBefore (mean)After (mean)Sites upSites downSites unchanged
AI-era vocabulary, style words only (AI-topic phrases removed), per 1,000 words1.051.93832737
AI-era marketing vocabulary per 1,000 words1.092.19882336
Dotcom corporate vocabulary per 1,000 words1.611.60576129
Words of prose on the homepage677.45858.04101460
Average sentence length (words)9.209.4280670
Contractions per 1,000 words11.9211.4961851
Exclamation marks per 1,000 words1.922.22555141
Em dashes per 1,000 words1.151.24523857
ScriptGrain AI-tell density per 1,000 words0.160.111526106
Share of I/we/you pronouns that are 'you'0.590.5979671

The AI-era words that moved most

Uses per 100,000 words, all homepages in 2019 to 2022 (an asterisk covers every ending: unlock* counts unlock, unlocks, unlocked and unlocking) , 351,878 words, against 2023 to 2026 (421,966 words).

Word or phrase2019 to 20222023 to 2026Uses beforeUses after
unlock*7.131.325132
ai-powered (AI topic, not in the headline figure)3.120.41186
seamless*8.016.62870
at scale4.010.21443
streamline*3.18.51136
unleash*2.65.5923
elevate*5.47.81933
reimagin*2.65.0921
revolutioniz*1.43.8516
in seconds1.74.0617

By sector

Paired before and after within each sector, plus each sector's level from 2023 to 2026. Some sectors have under ten sites, so read single sectors as indications rather than findings. The biggest relative rises were in retail and travel; software homepages use the em dash most (69% of them since 2023).

SectorSitesAI-era words per 1,000, beforeAfterSites upSites downMedian words, 2023 to 2026With an em dash, 2023 to 2026
Software282.693.8820763869%
Hardware and electronics131.163.4010336824%
Agencies and consultancies101.592.616352039%
Travel130.411.655038116%
Web and marketing tools90.751.293257759%
Consumer brands150.871.275326517%
Logistics and cars101.231.215246226%
Retail240.281.1713355418%
Banking and finance180.310.927179117%
Telecoms and media100.480.896394633%
Insurance80.180.393055821%

Year by year

YearHomepages measuredMedian wordsMedian sentence lengthAI-era words per 1,000 (style)Dotcom words per 1,000With an em dashWith an exclamation mark
2000391697.90.423.653%54%
2001541928.20.493.187%52%
2002601757.70.292.418%45%
2003632357.80.243.285%37%
2004742278.10.113.458%39%
2005822098.10.142.6210%38%
20061012478.20.242.7010%35%
20071032458.00.582.079%33%
20081032518.00.341.8912%38%
20091172877.80.241.6110%33%
20101203197.30.442.0616%30%
20111223437.60.322.3418%37%
20121243417.40.452.0719%39%
20131243797.70.422.1716%35%
20141283967.90.572.4618%33%
20151363938.10.831.6921%36%
20161323998.10.641.9420%42%
20171263778.60.822.0023%32%
20181313798.50.962.0027%38%
20191334288.81.291.9329%35%
20201324379.20.861.5530%33%
20211364179.21.121.6828%29%
20221284819.11.071.4227%39%
20231295228.81.501.4232%39%
20241255209.11.861.3829%35%
20251215769.51.791.3535%45%
20261076069.02.171.7738%35%

Coverage: what happened to every site and year

161 sites over 27 years is 4,347 site-years. Every one is accounted for here, so the gaps can be judged.

YearMeasuredUnder 100 words of proseBot or block pageNo capture that yearCould not be rendered
200039661550
200154621440
200260611390
200363592370
200474542310
200582580210
2006101410190
2007103390190
2008103321250
2009117321110
201012032090
201112229091
201212429080
201312431060
201412827141
201513621130
201613222142
201712625073
201813123052
201913320044
202013221053
202113616081
202212826061
2023129160142
202412524291
2025121223123
2026107274167

Checks

Fixed panel: repeating the yearly trend on the 117 sites measured in at least 9 of the 12 years from 2015 gives the same picture: AI-era words (style) 1.22 per 1,000 in 2021, 1.16 in 2022, 2.38 in 2026; median homepage 481 words in 2022 and 652 in 2026.

Raw HTML instead of rendered pages, for the 2,762 captures fetched directly from the archive: measuring the archived HTML without running its scripts gives the same before and after direction: AI-era words (style) 1.41 to 2.52 per 1,000, up on 51 sites and down on 21.

With the AI-topic phrases left in, the full AI-era list rises from 1.09 to 2.19 per 1,000 words (up on 88 sites, down on 23).

Limitations

Competing interests

ScriptGrain sells writing-voice measurement and generation, and the analyst builds it. The panel and both word lists were fixed before anything was measured, nothing was re-run or selected, and the scripts are published, so the numbers can be checked without taking our word for them.

Reproducing this

Data

Released under CC BY 4.0: free to reuse, including commercially, with credit to ScriptGrain and a link to this page.

Citations

How to cite

ScriptGrain (2026). Did ChatGPT change how companies write? 27 years of homepages, measured (Study SGR-004, conducted 4 October 2026). Dataset licensed CC BY 4.0. https://scriptgrain.com/research/did-chatgpt-change-how-companies-write